General Information
| Topic |
Group Size |
Time
|
| Understanding and Challenging Misinformation in Ecology and Sustainability
|
20-35 people
|
1.5 hours
|
Activity Overview
| Overview:
|
Green Truths & Myths is an interactive group activity designed to sharpen participants' critical thinking skills by challenging them to differentiate between factual statements and misinformation related to ecology and sustainability.
|
| Themes:
|
Critical Thinking
Environmental Education
Media Literacy
|
| Objectives:
|
1. To understand how environmental information can be manipulated, distorted, or denied.
2. To develop critical thinking about the sources of environmental information.
3. To recognize the dangers of misinformation in the context of sustainability.
|
| Materials:
|
Flipchart
Pens and markers
One table for each team
|
| Preparation:
|
Prepare a list of environmental statements, both factual and misleading, from various sources. These could include popular myths, actual facts, misconceptions, and instances of greenwashing.
|
Target Group
Adults and teenagers aged 14 and above who have an interest in environmental issues, sustainability, and critical thinking. The activity is suitable for both individuals with prior knowledge of environmental topics and those new to the subject. It is especially beneficial for those who want to enhance their ability to discern genuine environmental claims from misleading ones and for those looking to cultivate a more informed perspective on sustainability practices and information.
Instructions
1. Introduction (10 minutes)
Briefly explain the objective of the activity to participants: to critically evaluate statements related to the environment and sustainability.
Emphasize the importance of being well-informed and critical when encountering environmental information, especially in today's digital age where misinformation can spread rapidly.
2. Warm-Up Discussion (15 minutes)
Begin by asking participants to name recent environmental events or crises they're aware of.
Ask follow-up questions:
"Where did you learn about this?"
"How certain are you that the information was accurate?"
"Why is it important to have accurate information on this topic?"
3. Statement Evaluation (30 minutes)
Present participants with a series of prepared environmental statements. These should vary from accurate, to misleading, to completely false.
Example statements, along with brief explanations:
The Amazon rainforest is often referred to as the 'lungs of the Earth'.
Explanation: This is a commonly used metaphor. While the Amazon is crucial for carbon sequestration, calling it the 'lungs' can be misleading. Trees absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen, but so do other forests and algae in the oceans.
Climate change is a natural occurrence and has nothing to do with human activity.
Explanation: While climate change has natural cycles, the current accelerated rate of change is predominantly due to human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels.
Plastic straws make up the majority of ocean pollution.
Explanation: While plastic straws are problematic and contribute to ocean pollution, they represent a small fraction. Larger issues include discarded fishing nets, larger plastic debris, and microplastics.
Most of the world's renewable energy comes from solar panels.
Explanation: Solar energy is a growing renewable source, but as of now, the majority of the world's renewable energy comes from sources like hydroelectric and wind power.
Ask participants to work in pairs or small groups. For each statement, they should discuss:
Whether they believe the statement is true or false.
The reasons behind their belief.
Any personal experiences or prior knowledge related to the statement.
4. Group Discussion and Reveal (25 minutes)
Reconvene and go through each statement one by one.
Ask each group to share their conclusions and rationales.
After each group has shared, provide the correct information and explanation for each statement.
Discuss the potential origins of any misconceptions, addressing how and why certain entities might spread misinformation on environmental topics.
Debriefing and Evaluation
Which statement did you find most surprising or challenging, and why?
Were there any statements you initially believed to be true before the explanations were provided?
Can you identify common misconceptions or misunderstandings about ecology and sustainability in the real world, based on this activity?
Why do you think such statements or myths become widespread?
How do word choices and phrasing influence our perception of environmental issues, as demonstrated in the statements?
Did the use of certain terms or metaphors in the statements affect your initial judgment?
How will this activity influence your future encounters with environmental claims or statements?
Do you feel more prepared to critically assess such statements in real-life situations?
What did you learn from your group's discussions and debates about the statements?
Were there disagreements within the group, and how were they resolved?
Did the activity effectively challenge your preconceptions about environmental issues?
Were there any statements or topics you wish had been included?
What aspect of the activity did you find most valuable?
How can the activity be refined or expanded in the future?
Tips for facilitators
Familiarize yourself with the statements and their explanations. Anticipate potential questions or challenges participants might pose.
Stay updated with current environmental news and events. This helps in addressing real-time concerns or queries participants might have.
Create a safe space where participants feel comfortable sharing their beliefs without fear of ridicule. This will help surface more misconceptions for discussion.
Actively engage quieter members to ensure everyone's voice is heard.
Remember, your role is to guide the discussion, not control it. Allow participants to explore topics, even if they stray slightly from the activity's main focus. It's important not to show bias, especially when participants have differing opinions. Your role is to present facts and guide the discussion.
Variations
Before discussing the statements, give participants time (either during the activity or as homework) to research each statement. They can then present their findings to the group, promoting self-directed learning.
Once a misconception has been identified and discussed, ask participants to imagine the implications if the misconception were true. How would it change our approach to sustainability? What actions would be prioritized?
Invite an expert on a particular topic to discuss misconceptions. This lends credibility to the facts and offers participants a chance to interact with professionals in the field.
Encourage participants to come up with their own statements related to sustainability, either based on their beliefs or common myths they've heard. The group can then discuss and investigate these statements.
Copyright Information
This activity was developed during the "Eco-Youth Empowerment Through Education and Action" Training Course, coordinated by ARYAS NGO together with its partners: Asociatia Euroactive NGO - Romania, EUROACTIVE BULGARIA, Euroactive NGO Alapítvány - Hungary, Amazing Youth - Greece, ORIEL APS - Italy, Instytut Rozdzienskiego - Poland, Kasif Genclik ve Spor Kulubu Denergi - Turkey, and Yaygin Egitim ve Genclik Calismalari Dernegi - Turkey. This initiative was co-financed by the European Commission through the Erasmus+ program.
Everyone is free to use and adapt this resource for educational and non-commercial purposes. However, its commercial use or reproduction for profit is strictly prohibited.
